Tag: mindfullness

  • remaining curious

    Image: Ghetto Curious George by the Frankfurt School made available on flickr by a creative commons license.

    (crossposted at leadertalk)

    About a week and a half ago, the night before beginning at a new school, I wrote a post called Allowing Curriculum Planning to Remain Curious. I
    wrote about how I needed to remain curious about my students and their
    contexts in order to create meaningful curriculum for them.

    Today
    I am struck with how important it is to remain curious. One of the
    reasons I reminded myself to remain curious, to not fall back on old
    assumptions about learning, is because I am in a new school. With a new
    school comes a whole new culture and different sets of needs and
    expectations. Christian Long helped me towards this reminder when he wrote, in his note to self on the eve of his own first day at a new school, “You have plenty of time to share new ideas,
    but listening, watching, and respecting is the first rule of business.
    Listening and watching is your best trait going forward in this first
    year.”

    My mind keeps returning to that notion of remaining curious. How easy
    it is to be curious now that I am in a new school, but I am already
    noticing that I have created opinions about my students and the school
    that I take for granted after only one week! So, how much easier it is
    to create assumptions and rely on them rather than question and try to
    understand!

    I’m coming to the realization that remaining curious about what I do
    as a teacher, a program planner, a member of a school community is
    precious. By keeping myself open to possibilities, by trying to
    understand the hows and whys of things, I keep education alive for me
    and it remains my passion.

    So my task going forward is remembering to remain curious.

    Powered by ScribeFire.

  • Ethics in the classroom and common ground

    I have been involved in a very stimulating conversation on Durff’s blog around the issue of ethics in the classroom.

    Both Durff and I agree that ethical behaviour must be stressed in the classroom and modeled by teachers. I think you can tell from our comments that we are both quite passionate about this.

    Where our views start to differ is how this is done. You can read about our differing viewpoints in the comments to the original post – what I find interesting is the conversation that has developed.

    Ethics is messy – it really does have to do with our own world-views and it can be messy and difficult to talk about the things that really matter to us, the things that hit us in our gut, that touch our values around what it means to be human. The rub in all of this is that we do not all have the same values nor the same world view.

    Two of my beliefs related to this topic:

    • I strongly believe that we can not assume there to be one ethical plumbline to live by. Furthermore I think that this assumption implies another, that if one does not adhere to this plumbline then one is acting unethically. I think this is problematic in any society that is diverse.
    • I believe that ethical decisions should be contextual and arrived at from within a situation rather than determined from external sources like codes of conduct/ethics. (I have written more on this subject, if you are at all interested I invite you to read this paper, though I warn you it is a bit lengthy :) Conversations for ethical decision-making in secondary schools (Rosen, 2005) )

    I do think it important – indeed necessary – to create a common ground in order to be able to have conversations around ethics, in order to be able to teach about ethics.

    In trying to understand Durff’s insistence on an ethical plumbline, I wonder if perhaps this common ground is something along the lines of what she means.

    Such a common ground for me would have to:

    • acknowledge that there is more than one world-view in the room
    • acknowledge that my world-view is not better or worse than yours, just different
    • be prepared to learn about different beliefs and world-views
    • be prepared to take a considered position when I am involved in decision-making
    • understand that a considered position includes more than one or two considerations

    What would be important for you to have in this common ground?

    Technorati Tags:

    Powered by ScribeFire.

  • Just whose achievement gap is it, anyway?


    Image: found on the Internet Ray Tracing Competition website

    Found this, love it.

    We must reject the ideology of the “achievement gap” that absolves
    adults of their responsibility and implies student culpability in
    continued under-performance. The student achievement gap is merely the
    effect of a much larger and more debilitating chasm: The Educator
    Achievement Gap. We must erase the distance between the type of
    teachers we are, and the type of teachers they need us to be.

    From Teaching in the 408 by TMAO (really hoping that means what I think it means.)

    Reminds me of a quote that used to hang in a colleague’s office:

    If you’ve told him how to do it a million times and he still doesn’t get it, then who is the slow learner?

    Powered by ScribeFire.

  • Teaching and work/life balance: Whatcha think?


    Image: Balance by EisforEdmund made available on flickr with a creative commons license.

    I came across this little statistic today.

    65%

    Proportion
    of former public school teachers who say they’re better able to balance
    work and life now that they’re working outside the education field.

    SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education; National Center for Education Statistics Teacher Follow-up Survey.

     

     

    What do you think about that?



    I found it reading an article called Why teachers quit by Kimberley Palmer in Teacher Magazine.

    (if you aren’t already a subscriber – register already! It’s free!)

    Powered by ScribeFire.

  • Motivation and change, values and passion: Making the connections

    [cross-posted at LeaderTalk]

    I will be returning to the classroom at the end of August after a year as a special education consultant and professional development facilitator. I decided to return for a variety of reasons, the most important being that I miss the energy I pick up from daily contact with students and the next that there are so many things I want/need to try with students as their learning contexts change at such an exciting and fast-paced rate.

    Today I am still a consultant and I am preparing for a teacher induction session we are designing for new teachers in our school system, the Association of Jewish Day Schools of Montreal. (Interestingly enough, I will be facilitating that session on the 21st and participating in one at the new school system on the following day!) The other day I spent the afternoon looking for video examples of different aspects of classroom management to include in the session. What I found was certainly food for reflection.

    Essentially, I seem to have a choice between the inspirational teacher a la Erin Gruwell
    (Freedom Writers) and Jaime Escalante (Stand and Deliver) in Hollywood teacher movies or the angry teacher in student cell phone videos on youtube.

    I have yet to meet a teacher who become one in order to be angry at his or her students or in order to expect mediocrity from them (check out this cute little movie on that theme :) ) yet … I know teachers who do this on a regular basis.

    On the contrary, most teachers I have spoken with became teachers because they want to make a difference in the lives of learners, like Erin Gruwell, and because they want to share a passion they have around a certain subject and see it grow strong in young people, like Jaime Escalante.

    I have recently had the pleasure of working with teachers who had forgotten why they became teachers.

    Yes, it was a pleasure.

    I want to give my reason by framing it a bit first. Kelly Christopherson‘s recent post in LeaderTalk addresses the issue of motivation and it got me to thinking.

    How do teachers stay motivated to teach and to learn when the playing field changes on such an astounding level?

    I am motivated to teach and to learn, to action, when what I am doing has relevance for me because it is tied to my core values, my passion. The answer for me, therefore, lies in this next compound question:

    How do we reconnect teachers with their passion AND reframe it within changing contexts?

    I firmly believe that before we can motivate teachers to do anything new we need to connect it to what is important to them, to tie it to their values and their passion.

    Relevance and seeing purpose are key to internal motivation – and we know that internal motivation is key to learning. Dr. Marvin Marshall writes, in Using a discipline approach to promote learning:

    “True change must come from INSIDE an individual, and therefore a teacher must understand how to create an environment in the classroom in which children WANT to learn, WANT to behave appropriately, and WANT to achieve.” (para. 5)

    Not only must a teacher understand this for students in the classroom, but the same understandings apply for leaders about the teachers in their schools.

    Now, to return to the teachers who had forgotten why they became teachers.

    It was a pleasure to work with them because we began a change process that started off as some run-of the mill PD on Differentiated Instruction (DI) that is becoming a shift in school culture that will allow Differentiated Instruction to take root as a learning model in that school.

    It was a pleasure because I saw angry and unmotivated teachers rediscover their passion for teaching by being allowed to have the time to talk with each other and their school leaders about their concerns and fears, but most importantly about their dreams for themselves as teachers.

    At first, many of the teachers at this school did not want to learn about DI. They said it was nice in an ideal world but would never work in their classrooms. So we stopped teaching the theory and the strategies and we started to focus on the teachers. I asked them – What is it about teaching that touches your soul? And the conversation grew from there. By the end of two sessions the teachers (all but 3 who are still holding out, but their colleagues are working on them!) asked us to return to the DI workshop we had begun because they insisted it was relevant to their needs and the needs of their students.

    The school’s principal fully supports the learning that her teachers need to do together and has abolished monthly staff meetings in order to allow structured time for groups of teachers to meet to talk and learn together. This support is integral. The most inspired of teachers can lose their inspiration without it. In researching this post today, I found an article that underlines this importance:

    Stand and Deliver Revisited. The untold story behind the famous rise — and shameful fall — of Jaime Escalante, America’s master math teacher.

    As I transition back into the classroom and into a new school community I will bring what I learned while working with this group of teachers with me. Values and passion are powerful stuff. If we can stay connected to that our schools will become powerful indeed – and imagine the students!

    So, I ask you…

    What is it about teaching that touches your soul?

    Powered by ScribeFire.