Category: Classroom

  • Interesting conversation about teaching and technology

    I had a very interesting conversation with a colleague the other day. She is a teacher in adult education with upwards of 35 years in the classroom and she said to me that the model we recently used in her class and others, with me going directly into the classroom and working with students, makes sense to her.

    classroom
    I love this drawing of a classroom. It was done by Todd Berman, a substitute teacher in San Francisco. Click it to go to his website.
    (I visited her Economics classroom and talked about technology and advertising. Then I returned on 3 different occasions to work directly with individual and small groups of students as they created advertisements for virtual businesses.)

    She said (and these are her words) that she will never know enough about tech to be able to teach her students anything new about tech. She said that it is a waste of time to send her off to do workshops to learn a new technology in the hopes that she would then teach it to her students, and that it is best to show the tech to the students so they can use it within the context of her curriculum and that, if anything, they should be the ones showing her how to use it.

    This model
    a) keeps teachers in the classroom as opposed to sending them out of the classroom for PD.
    b) allows teachers to focus on their curriculum while offering different pathways to students to get through it
    c) allows for professional collaboration between teachers and consultants
    d) fosters student leadership as they learn new tools from a consultant and can show it to each other and their teachers.

    We went on to talk about how the big work is in creating teachers like her who are willing to let something like that happen in their classrooms.

    I like that idea – the idea of classroom as a site of professional learning.

  • Teaching in the dark

    Lately I have been teaching in the dark.

    Our school has no Internet access. The students have none at home, either.

    What do we do? We read. We have conversations, live conversations, about what we read. We look for solutions together and they are made from the stuff of our brains.

    Did I mention that we read? My students in Grades 7 through 11 love to read. All of them. And they can have and do have conversations about the books they read. They can even make connections between them. They jump up and down with pure joy about some of the books they are reading. I actually have to tell students to stop reading.

    I see the Science teacher outside, collecting insects with the students, examining them under microscopes and in their terrariums. I see evidence of writing in French when they students laboriously and lovingly work on their scrapbooks by hand and write letters describing why they included what they did.

    At lunch time students play with each other. Yes. Even the boys in Grade 11.

    Lately I have been teaching in the dark and I’m surprised to say it has been illuminating.

  • How I motivate my students and manage my classroom without reward systems

    Read the following quotes, I’m going to be reflecting on them in relation to my philosophy of teaching and learning around motivation and classroom management and what all of that looks like in my classroom.

    Babies cry for a reason. It’s never ‘spoiling’ your baby to take his baby’s cries seriously, and to respond to them. Babies are not manipulative, and don’t cry to wind you up – they cry to communicate distress, and need you to ‘put things right’, if you can.

    A consistent response to your baby’s needs allows your baby to gain confidence and understanding that you’re around for her and she can trust you – he’ll learn to wait for attention eventually, but right now she needs you to come to her straight away. Research shows very clearly that babies who’ve been cared for in this responsive way cry less as they get older. (BBC Health)

    Immediate response to a baby’s cry went unquestioned for thousands of years until recent times. In our culture, we assume that crying is normal and unavoidable for babies. Yet in natural societies where babies are carried close to the care-giver much of the day and night for the first several months, such crying is rare. In contrast to what many in our society would expect, babies cared for in this way show self-sufficiency sooner than do babies not receiving such care.

    In fact, research on early childhood experiences consistently shows that children who have enjoyed the most loving care in infancy become the most secure and loving adults, while those babies who have been forced into submissive behaviour build up feelings of resentment and anger that may well be expressed later in harmful ways. (Jan Hunt – The Natural Child Project)

    What cry research tells us. Researchers Sylvia Bell and Mary Ainsworth performed studies in the 1970’s that should have put the spoiling theory on the shelf to spoil forever. (It is interesting that up to that time and even to this day, the infant development writers that preached the cry-it-out advice were nearly always male. It took female researchers to begin to set things straight.) These researchers studied two groups of mother-infant pairs. Group 1 mothers gave a prompt and nurturant response to their infant’s cries. Group 2 mothers were more restrained in their response. They found that children in Group 1 whose mothers had given an early and more nurturant response were less likely to use crying as a means of communication at one year of age. These children seemed more securely attached to their mothers and had developed better communicative skills, becoming less whiny and manipulative. (AskDrSears.com)

    Each time you try to respond promptly to your newborn’s cries, you simply send your baby a message that you’re there to tend to her needs. (Dartmouth-Hitchcock)

    So, no, I don’t teach like my hair is on fire. I don’t really think that Rafe Esquith does either. He teaches like his heart is on fire, and that’s the greatest thing a teacher can offer his/her students. And when you are reading about astounding things that others are doing, don’t get overwhelmed by the how’s. Focus on the why’s. When you do that, you will find inspiration to light the fires of your students. (Kelly Hines)

    Be genuinely interested, caring, kind, and loving to your students.
    It’s that simple.
    It’s that hard. (Michael Doyle)

    And finally, Monday morning @chucksandy tweeted in my ear

    “If you treat people right & show you care about them you’re going to do some amazing things” says @gcouros.

    Last year I started to teach French as a 2nd Language at an elementary school in Eastern Ontario. Slightly out of my comfort zone as I had been teaching High School everything (I was an alternative school teacher at different schools) for many years before that. The school board promotes the use of the AIM Language Learning method, of which a large component is the use of coupons for using French. So I started to use them – after all, they were part of the program.

    Then I remember who I am as a teacher, and I stopped.

    I remember writing, just before I began teaching as a French teacher:

    I am not interested in offering rewards. I don’t want to raise a group of trained seals who will do anything for a candy.

    I think the answer lies somewhere in here:

    If you want to build a ship, don’t drum up the men to gather wood, divide the work, and give orders. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea.— Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

    in creating learning situations where they must speak the 2nd language in order to participate and where they will want to participate…

    So what do I do when I remember who I am as a teacher?

    It starts off with my being wholly present to them as their teacher. I remain accessible. I love them. I remain interested in who they are and excited for them. I am also interested in who I am and excited for what I am teaching them. Excitement, interest, and love is contagious :)

    I taught French so we talked a lot. I told them stories, they told me stories. Very quickly we established that French class was for talking and we created a safe place for that to happen. I probably had the noisiest classes in the school. For the most part they were good noisy. When the noise started to be more English than French and becoming more waste of time noisy, I intervened and got us back on track or switched gears, depending on what was necessary. We played games a lot :) At the same time, I knew that there were some students who needed to be allowed to speak English in order to learn to speak French. So I let that happen. For some students, I only spoke to them in French. For others, I made sure to ask them about their day, their pet, their grandmother in English.

    When things didn’t go so well, I was also present for them. When students were consistently not doing the work expected of them we’d have lunch dates (actually after lunch dates, we ate first then worked) to get the work done. Sometimes the work wasn’t being done because they were fooling around, sometimes because they needed some extra time, sometimes because they needed some extra help. The lunch dates worked for all of those reasons. When things weren’t going so well socially and it carried over into class I was also present for them. I’d get the rest of the class going on some activity (it was usually for these times I’d save the quieter seat work) and we’d go to a (semi) private area of the classroom and address the issue together.

    That was an example from elementary school, where I taught basic French (50 minutes/day) to students from JK – Grade 6. Most of the classes were split grades and the students in each class ranged from being able to speak French fluently to zero French language ability (or desire), some students were reading and writing above their age level, some had learning disabilities, a few had autism. I had anywhere from 15 students (JK/SK class) to 34 students per class.

    Before teaching French I taught a variety of subjects to students in Grades 10 and 11, in an alternative program where I had about 18 students per group and where our first job was getting the students to come to school and to take responsibility for their learning so they could graduate high school before turning 18.

    Again, though the context was different, creating a safe environment for learning was the key to successful learning. Being present. Caring. Flexible. About what, how and who I was teaching. In this setting we didn’t have lunch dates, we had after school dates but for the same reasons as in the elementary school: for students who needed more time, who didn’t complete work, who needed more me, who needed a quiet place to work – they had a date with me after school. When social issues trumped academic activity, we dealt with it so that work could get done.

    Celebration in both settings happened for its own sake and wasn’t tied to behaviour.

    I left that job because I moved. At first I travelled the 3 hours a day for work but it quickly took its toll and the travel time left less of me available to be present at work. I wasn’t doing a good job being present and it wasn’t fair to me, my students, or my colleagues (not to mention my dogs with their legs crossed at home when I stayed until 5, 6, or later with students :) ) Being present, caring, excited, and interested about my teaching and students is so tied into what I do as a teacher that I felt I was becoming a lousy teacher. I had to stop.

    They don’t care how much you know until they know how much you care. Showing my students my genuine interest in them as people is worth so much more than a sticker chart or a jar of marbles.

    It doesn’t happen right away, it’s a process. Just like any other relationship, even like the relationship mothers have with their newborns: if I show them that I am present for them when they most need it they learn to trust and become more confident about their learning. Its a process so worth going through. Each and every time.

  • Looking Back: Stop talking about classrooms that don’t work

    As part of my Looking Back series, the sentiments I articulated in this post from August 21st, 2010 are still very alive for me. There are classrooms that work, that work very well. Click on the title below to go to the original post with its comments.

    Here is an example of a ‘traditional’ classroom in Japan (scroll down to ‘Inspiration in a Japanese elementary school’). Can you imagine if these students did not have this place? What a shame that would be.

    —-

    Stop talking about classrooms that don’t work

    This morning I read a thoughtful post about what ADD may or may not be. Despite the timeliness and depth of thought present in the article, I was stricken by one paragraph about the perils of classrooms on our children. How our young children today, so rife with creative potential, are doomed to a future of diagnosis and boredom because they will be subjected to school.

    I was not only stricken but insulted.

    Does all of the work that I and many of my colleagues have done over the past years have no bearing on the future of education? Do all of those teachers out there in schools all over the world who care about their children not count?

    I feel we need to get beyond the system is broken kind of thinking and focus on what is working. We see what we look for and if we keep focusing on a broken system we will only succeed in creating more broken system.

    Instead of creating a doomsday effect by telling ominous stories of the proliferation of ‘traditional’ classrooms that stifle creativity and connectivity, I prefer to point towards learning that does the opposite, learning that works and educators who ‘get it’.

    George Couros
    Michael Doyle
    Lori Centerbar
    Kevin Hodgson
    Glenn Moses
    Linda Clinton
    Elona Hartjes
    Darren Kuropatwa
    Kelly Hines
    Karen S.
    Dea Conrad-Curry
    Zac Chase
    Angela Maiers
    Chris Lehmann
    Jose Vilson
    MRW
    Damian Bariexca
    J. M. Holland

    .
    .
    .

    You get the point. There are good educators who foster good learning in good classrooms in good schools. I keep this in mind as I work towards hope for the future within (and without) the walls of my own school.

  • The philosophical bubble of technology in education

    Living in a Bubble – Viviendo en una Burbujaa, 2006
    Living in a Bubble – Viviendo en una Burbujaa, 2006

    I recently wrote a small blog post on BlogHer about using technology in the classroom. Of the 3 comments it received, 2 of them were from concerned parents. They were concerned with how students are encouraged to type on a computer rather than work on their writing skills.

    These comments mirror those made by some parents of my students in the past. For them, using technology in the classroom means using a computer as a word processor to eliminate messy work.

    Think about that for a bit.

    As educators we debate about whether or not using technology in our classrooms is a must on a philosophical level while some of our parents (and indeed teachers, too, but that is another matter) see it as an add-on to the curriculum. An add-on that could easily be done away with at times.

    To be clear, I do not think that to teach without ‘technology’ (I still cringe when I type that word. It means way too many things!) is necessarily a bad thing. Using technology (ugh) is one way of developing collaborative, thoughtful students with critical thinking skills. They are other ways (Yes! I said it!) but when we do use technology in our classrooms, how are we communicating with our students’ parents about why and how we use it to enhance learning in our students?

    I wrote a post about it for BlogHer as a way of bridging the gap between the philosophical bubble we have created as educators and those outside of it:

    What exactly do we mean by using technology in education?