Author: Tracy Rosen

  • Do people learn differently?

    Yes and no.

    The ‘no’ part of the equation –> I believe that the conditions for authentic learning are similar across age levels, interests, abilities, cultures.

    Making a connection, creating a relationship with your learners is the first step to authentic learning. full stop.

    The ‘yes’ part of the answer comes in when it comes to motivation. For example, a kindergarten student is motivated to learn for much different reasons than an adult learner. An adult learner has different reasons for learning than a high school student.

    It’s for this reason that I’ve decided to explore adult learning at AdultEd.TracyRosen.com

    AdultEd.TracyRosen.com

    Come join me, won’t you?

  • Theories of Social and Behaviour Change – Passing on resources

    I just received these resources from Rosemary, a professor of mine from when I studied Human Systems Intervention at Concordia University in Montreal (a program definitely worth checking out!) and thought what better way to a) save them and b) share them, than to do so by posting them here. So here they are with a thanks to Rosemary :)

    1. Bandura’s Theory of Social Learning, which states that people learn
    through observation, imitation, and modeling. Self-efficacy influences
    behaviour in that people are more likely to engage in certain behaviours
    when they believe they are capable of successfully modeling the behaviour.

    * For an example of a programme drawing upon Bandura’s theory, see:
    Neighbors Radio Drama

    * For a 10-minute YouTube video on Bandura’s theory, see:
    http://www.comminit.com/clickthru/ef7d90b008d59219bd25fca6e704e6af?node=

    2. Lewin’s Theory of Change, which “adds the role of emotion, dialogue and
    debate to an understanding of how behaviour change takes place: behaviour
    (often resistant to change) is lifted up for scrutiny (sometimes through
    an ’emotional stir-up’) and reconfigured through a process of discursive
    elaboration (dialogue and debate) of new and preferable alternatives.”

    * For more on Lewin’s Theory of Change (with an accompanying video), see:
    http://www.comminit.com/clickthru/bacc9967686ca488e98e3476f3b7e30b?node=

    3. Paulo Freire’s concept of critical consciousness, which emphasises
    awareness-raising and the exposure of social, economic, and political
    contradictions, together with taking action (individually and/or
    collectively) against “the oppressive elements of society”. The notion of
    learning-through-action-and-reflection underlies Soul City’s
    community-based work. “As in the case of individual behaviour, collective
    efficacy is important in that communities are more likely to take action
    if they believe their action will make a difference.”

    * For more on Freire’s theory, see:
    Pedagogy of the Oppressed by Paulo Freire – An Analysis

    * For an example of an initiative drawing on Freire’s theory, see:
    Applying Freirian Model for Development and Evaluation of Community-based
    Rehabilitation Programmes

    4. Social Identity Theory, which presents an explanatory account of the
    importance of social norms in determining behaviour. “Social
    identification with a reference group is a key component of identity.”
    “Social identity” refers to the individual’s knowledge that he or she
    belongs to certain social groups and that this group membership has
    emotional significance and value. “Positive social identity keeps groups
    together and at the same time regulates individual behaviour.”

    * For more on this theory, see Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory,
    by Jan E. Stets and Peter J. Burke, Social Psychology Quarterly 2000, Vol.
    63, No. 3, 224-237:

    5. Cialdini’s Focus Theory of Normative Conduct, which elaborates on the
    role of norms in determining behaviour. The theory distinguishes between
    descriptive and injunctive norms. “How a person responds to a descriptive
    or injunctive norm when they contradict each other is determined by which
    kind of norm is salient (or in focus) at the time. The saliency of the
    norm is influenced by situational factors such as: the social group around
    the person; the importance of the action; and the circumstances which
    accompany the situation.”

    * See, for example, this summary of an article by Robert B. Cialdini on
    The Soul Beat Africa site: New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior:
    The Application of Persuasion Theory to the Development Of Effective
    Proenvironmental Public Service Announcements

    6. Information-Motivation-Behaviour-Skills model, which is a
    learning-based model that acknowledges the role of social norms and peer
    modeling, and highlights knowledge, attitudes, generic self efficacy, and
    instrumental behavioural skills in bringing about behaviour change.

    * Please see this summary of a thesis that explores this and other
    theories might be of interest:
    Evaluating Mass Media Health Communication: The Use of Evaluation Data to
    Improve Theory

    7. Theory of Interpersonal Behaviour, which states that the 3 most
    important factors determining the probability of behaviour are habit,
    intention, and facilitating conditions. The theory further explains the
    role of beliefs, anticipated outcomes, norms, roles, self-concept,
    emotions, and attitudes in determining behaviour.

    * A thesis which is focused on this theory includes: Triandis’ Theory of
    Interpersonal Behaviour in Understanding Software Piracy Behaviour in the
    South African Context
    , by Julie Robinson, August 10 2010

    8. Gibbons and Gerard’s Prototype/Willingness Model, which introduces the
    concepts of “risk images” and “social comparison” and has been used to
    understand the process whereby young people in particular move from
    initial risky behaviours (based on “behavioural willingness”) to
    established risky behaviours (based on “behavioural intention”).

    * For more on this model, see the following summary:
    Do High- and Low-active Adolescents Have Different Prototypes of
    Physically Active Peers?

    9. A Complexity Thinking Approach, whereby behaviour is seen as the
    product of interactions between components of a whole system. The concept
    is that these interactions create effects (often unforeseen) which the
    components could not have generated singly (i.e. the whole is more than
    the sum of its parts). “Informed by an understanding of Complexity Theory,
    Soul City’s interventions aim to facilitate a process whereby options and
    solutions peculiar to a particular context can emerge. Thus through
    advocacy, social mobilization and media, Soul City facilitates the
    capacity to learn and models the direction of change whilst addressing
    many of the barriers to change.”

    * For more on complexity thinking, see:
    Evaluating Social Change and Communication For Social Change: New
    Perspectives

  • In the name of honour…not: Teachable takeaway from the Shafia verdict

    Turning on the car yesterday morning and the first words I heard from CBC were Shafia. On the television, in the newspaper, on my Internet browser…Shafia, Shafia, Shafia.

    And honour killing.

    Afghans around the world were interviewed to comment on honour killing.
    Random people on the street felt their country’s values vindicated through the guilty verdicts with statements like – Canada is not a place for honour killing.
    Facebook statuses were updated in the same vein: my country = no honour killing

    This is what I take away as teachable from this case.

    Somehow this case became more about honour killing and less about what it actually is – the killing of women. In Canada. We need to question this.

    Is it because when we talk about honour killing we think we are talking about something that has been transplanted here by recent immigrants and therefore not Canadian?

    Why was it that this particular murder of women got so much press? That this particular murder of women is taken so seriously by Canadians? Is it because of that lens? That honour killing lens that allowed us to look at it from a distance?

    Is that why the Canadian public (news media, government…) doesn’t look at murders of women like the 600 and counting missing/murdered aboriginal women across Canada with such sensationalism and ease? Because we can’t reframe those murders as easily?

    Reframe it in any way. What it comes down to is that there are people (many people) who still think it is ok to kill women. And yes, in Canada. And the Shafia case is but one example of this.

    For that, I am happy about the verdict. But not for the reasons it is being lauded in the media. Not.

  • On learning

    My young son learns by watching, by listening, by mimicking, by testing.

    He learns how to eat by watching me eat and then eating.
    He learns how to speak by hearing me speak and then speaking.
    He learns how to stand by standing. And I’m sure it’s because he sees us moving around that he wants to as well.

    Brought down to this simplicity, I am reminded of how important I am as a model in the learning process.

    And how important it is to let students do.

  • “National Canine Latin Barking assessments” – Canadian version

    I read Michael Doyle’s posts about the frustrations of the whole standardized hoop-jumping, I mean testing, situation with an odd sense of voyeurism. We just don’t have that kind of thing here…dare I say yet? In Ontario they do, maybe in other places in Canada, too. But Quebec is so involved in being unique that we have our own kettle of fish to conquer here in trying to balance uniform end of cycle examinations with individualized programming…

    Though…this year I am working at a school whose school board is located in the US. Our students took Canadian Achievement Tests (CAT-4) this year, which are meant to be benchmark tests for the federal government. The powers that be at our central board decided to do PD around comparing results in different domains and then told teachers to look at the domains that scored higher and ask the teachers who taught those domains to share their secrets to success, so to speak. Suggesting that teachers who scored higher (that is the actual phrase she used) were more successful (better) teachers than those who scored lower.

    That immediately raised my hackles. My domain, English Language Arts, scored the lowest. Given the logic of the recommendation given in our PD session, I should go speak with the Math teacher, whose domain scored the highest, for advice on how to raise our students abilities to score higher on timed standardized testing situations? Not to mention that our students took these tests in October at which time I had known them for approximately 4 weeks. And this situation was mirrored at different campuses in our school system.

    The ire that shot through my system for just that moment was shocking to me. And I got a fleeting sense of what it would be like to live with this kind of reality on a day-to-day basis.

    At the moment the Canadian version of the National Canine Latin Barking Assessments is contained to a few independent schools (at least in Quebec) but I fear it spreading. I really do. I don’t want to teach with an ounce of that bitter feeling I experienced when I heard the phrase, ‘teachers who scored higher on the tests’…