Social Networking and Life-Balance, do we even know what that is? Responding to Angela Stockman

February 20, 2011 at 7:51 am
filed under Social Networking

**originally published on 2011-02-20 07:51:20**

A long while ago (we’re talking 3 months people!), Angela left a meaty, thought-provoking comment on my post Why are we arguing that social networking does not have neg. effect on school & learning?. I apologize for not having acknowledged it, let alone responded to it, when it was made! The past few months have been a whirlwind of pre-baby/post-partum/new life changes :) At least Laura replied to some of what Angela said in her comment on the original post – thanks Laura!

The whole issue is a mammoth woolly elephant in the chat room, trolling in the background but not allowed to participate. Angela highlighted some key points that I’d like to further underline here.

She asked: Who is teaching kids about this? (social networking and mind/body/spirit balance)

Some people are thinking about this. If I do a quick Google search I find resources like:
Social networking sites: Finding a balance between their risks and benefits from Internet Solutions for Kids.

Minding MySpace: Balancing the benefits and risks of kids’ online social networks from California Schools Magazine

Generation text: Raising well-adjusted kids in an age of instant everything by Michael Osit

Parents: Instead of Banning Your Kids from Social Networks, Consider Teaching Responsible Usage from Managing Communities.

But none of these really address the issue of explicitly teaching kids life balance in an age of social networking. So I refined my search to responsible social networking lesson plan and found a few more things, including:

Responsible social networking – Secondary which has a lesson plan you can download

I’ve been talking about this myself for a while. Here’s a post from 2007, Facing up to Facebook where I wrote,

We need to be teaching kids about the realities of online social networks like facebook, and we need to be helping parents to do the same.

And one from 2008, Implications of Facebook Use. I used the story targeted in this post in my grade 11 classroom that year. I felt that since social networking is part of my teaching and such a huge part of my students’ lives it was essential that I teach about it.

But I didn’t find any explicit examples of teachers addressing the issue of how to balance our lives in an age of such public, 24 hour, social networking as we have now. Perhaps I didn’t look in the right places and perhaps such teaching is happening but isn’t being documented (such as in my example above, where I used something in my classroom but did not write about how I did so). I’d love to see some examples. I don’t mean examples of sites that offer tools to teach responsible and balanced social networking, but examples of teachers actually doing it in their classrooms.

Angela reflected: …it used to be that when social drama fired up at school, kids could find solace at home and experience a bit of a cooling-off period where they were away from the tension.

This begs me to ask, are we providing kids with access to tension-free environments in a time when the social sphere has no boundaries?

And finally, Angela writes: It’s hard to find conversations like these (that look at the positives and negatives of social networking) inside of my network though, and when I start them, most people disengage pretty quickly. Why do you think this is the case?

I think that the implications of the social networking debate is that it has created 2 camps – for or against. As educators and parents we may not understand how to balance our own thoughts and actions to do with social networking. We may also think ‘if I am for social networking, how can I speak out against it?’

Before we can teach about life-balance and social networking we need to know what it is and as long as we don’t allow it to participate in our conversations we won’t, will we?

1 comment

RSS / trackback


  1. Tracy

    on April 16, 2011 at 1:09 am

    Response from Angela:

    Hi Tracy! Thanks so much for sharing all of these resources. The conversation you opened around all of this is one that has been tugging at me throughout this year, and I’m finding myself drawn to teachers and administrators and practices that seem to be addressing-at least in part–the whole need for better balance.

    For instance, I’ve been noticing that quite a few primary teachers take time-outs from cognitive learning to teach kids simple yoga poses. Our home district–and many surrounding us–have made a commitment to healthy practices by changing menus, discouraging junk food at school, and involving kids in exercise challenges (Nina wears a pedometer every day to track her steps, and she LOVES doing this). They are also doing quite a bit with problem-solving and coaching face-to-face social interactions.

    What would be exciting is to see kids making the connection between efforts like these and the effect they could have on helping them seek balance beyond the academic setting and especially online.

    I understand why districts ban the use of some social networking tools, and from an education standpoint,I’ll admit that I’m still not sure where I stand on that. It doesn’t really matter, though, does it? The kids are engaging in these environments at home, many of them are getting little to no guidance as they do so, and they are struggling to care for themselves and others in ways that might allow them to come back to center–emotionally, spiritually, physically–when they need to.

    This is one topic that will continue to interest me. Looking forward to what others might share here and elsewhere.

Hillary Clinton et Donald Trump se livrent ce lundihogan outlet soir à leur premier duel télévisé, devant plus de scarpe hogan outlet? six semaines du scrutin, c'est le moment le plus scarpe hogan outletattendu de la course vers la Maison-Blanche. Cescarpe hogan outlet lundi soir, Hillary Clinton et Donald Trump scarpe hogan outlets'affrontent pour la première fois en direct scarpe hogan outletdevant les caméras de télévision. Un événementmoncler outlet online qui est à la campagne présidentielle ce que le moncler outlet onlineSuperbowl est au football américain: on attend moncler outlet onlineentre 100 et 150 millions de téléspectateurs woolrich outlet bolognapour cette heure et demie de thé?tre politiquewoolrich outlet bologna sans coupures publicitaires, retransmis woolrich outlet bolognaLes candidats jouent gros et ils se sontwoolrich outlet bologna préparés en conséquence. Trois duels moncler sito ufficialesont programmés d'ici au 9 octobre, mais moncler sito ufficialele premier est considéré comme le plus moncler sito ufficialeimportant, parce qu'il peut créer unedoudoune moncler impression durable et réduire le nombre doudoune monclerdes hésitants. Selon les sondages, ils sontdoudoune moncler un peu moins de 20 % à se déclarer indécisdoudoune moncler ou à être tentés par un troisième candidatdoudoune moncler - le libertarien Gary Johnson ou l'écologistedoudoune moncler Jill Stein. Or la compétition reste ultraserrée,doudoune moncler Donald Trump ayant presque entièrement rattrapé doudoune monclerle retard qu'il accusait sur Hillary Clinton doudoune monclerau mois d'ao?t. Les sondages nationaux donnentcanada goose pas chertoujours une avance de trois points en moyenne à la démocrate, mais le républicain s'est remis en selle dans unedemi-douzaine d'?tats clés, notamment la Floride,canada goose pas cherl'Ohio, la Caroline du Nord, l'Iowa, le canada goose pas cherNevada et l'Arizona. Clinton tient toujours la canada goose pas chercorde en Pennsylvanie, en Virginie, dans lecanada goose pas cher Michigan, le New Hampshire et le Wisconsin